- Description
-
- Creator(s)
- Thomas Girtin (1775-1802) after Charles-Louis Clérisseau (1721-1820)
- Title
-
- The Temple of Augustus at Pula in Istria
- Date
- 1797 - 1798
- Medium and Support
- Graphite, pen and ink and brush and ink on wove paper
- Dimensions
- 40.5 × 54.8 cm, 16 × 21 ⅝ in
- Inscription
‘T Girtin’ lower left, by Thomas Girtin (the signature has been cut, suggesting that it once extended onto an original mount which has been lost)
- Object Type
- Outline Drawing; Work from a Known Source: Foreign Master
- Subject Terms
- Ancient Ruins
-
- Collection
- Catalogue Number
- TG0896
- Girtin & Loshak Number
- 342 as 'Tempio di Pola'; '1799–1800'
- Description Source(s)
- Viewed in 2001 and 2018
Provenance
John Henderson (1764–1843); then by descent to John Henderson II (1797–1878) (lent to London, 1875); bequeathed to the Museum, 1878
Exhibition History
London, 1875, no.122 as ’Drawing of a Roman Temple ... Drawn with a reed pen’; London, 2002, no.102
Bibliography
Binyon, 1898–1907, no.104 as 'A Ruined Temple'
Place depicted
Revisions & Feedback
The website will be updated from time to time and, when changes are made, a PDF of the previous version of each page will be archived here for consultation and citation.
Please help us to improve this catalogue
If you have information, a correction or any other suggestions to improve this catalogue, please contact us.
About this Work
This view of the ruined Temple of Augustus at Pula in Istria, in modern Croatia, is based on an etching by Domenico Cunego (1727–1803) that, in turn, reproduced a composition by Charles-Louis Clérisseau (1721–1820) (see the source image above). The image, which forms a pair with another pen and ink drawing, Rome: The Temple of Saturn, Called the Temple of Concord (TG0893), follows Clérisseau’s original very closely, though Girtin cut the composition to the left and omitted a distracting tree. Otherwise he retained the complex and prominent contemporary genre scene, which plays itself out amongst the buildings that surround a temple that by the eighteenth century had been converted into a church, though this fact is not clear from either image. The Temple of Augustus, in the town known in Roman times as Pola, was the subject of a second image by Girtin (TG0886), this time made from an etching by the master of dramatic architectural scenes, Giovanni Battista Piranesi (1720–78). The two slightly different views make for a fascinating contrast of styles. Thus, whilst Girtin here works over a detailed pencil copy of the Clérisseau composition, reinforcing the lines in ink, in what may have been the slightly later version, he uses fluid washes of ink, added with a bravura despatch, to create a sketch that matches some of the bold freedom of Piranesi’s etching style.
Like its pair, which also employs a mix of brushwork with pen and ink to reinforce a detailed pencil drawing, this work comes from the collection of Girtin’s early patron John Henderson (1764–1843). Later versions of Clérisseau’s works by Girtin were made in watercolours for sale on the open market, but, as with as many as twenty or so copies after contemporaries and older masters commissioned by Henderson, this drawing was presumably made from a print in the patron’s collection. The majority of the resulting copies are in watercolours, so they follow the pattern of the bulk of the material produced by Girtin and Joseph Mallord William Turner (1775–1851) at the home of another early collector, Dr Thomas Monro (1759–1833); namely, they provided the patron with a more finished version of material that he had access to, either as a sketch or as a reproductive print. The two pen and ink drawings under consideration here are rather different, since the outline, however complex, is still no more finished than its source. It may be that as with Dartford High Street (TG0843), the outline was conceived as the first stage in the production of a watercolour (TG0844). However, the more likely rationale behind the work’s production is that, as has been seen in other cases, Henderson appreciated Girtin’s sketches in their own right, and it appears that he commissioned such views as examples of the young artist’s expertise with the pencil, pen and brush, much as others collected the sketches of earlier revered practitioners. Overlaying images of the drawing and its source shows how close a copy of the similarly sized etching it is, but it also demonstrates that it was made freehand rather than being traced and there is still much to be admired in Girtin’s inventive and fluent use of line. The depiction of the ruined temple, in particular, provides an object lesson in how, in the hands of a fine draughtsman, a line in pencil or ink has the capacity to be both decorative and descriptive at the same time, and the drawing was presumably deemed to be deserving of a place in the connoisseur’s collection as an example of Girtin’s skills.
On a technical note, the paper historian Peter Bower has identified the support employed by Girtin as a white wove drawing paper, probably manufactured by James Whatman the Younger (1741–98) (Smith, 2002b, p.129; Bower, Report). It is the same support that is employed in other Henderson commissions, including this work’s pair, Rome: The Temple of Saturn, Called the Temple of Concord.
Image Overlay
1796 - 1797
Rome: The Temple of Saturn, Called the Temple of Concord
TG0893
1797 - 1798
The Temple of Augustus at Pula in Istria
TG0886
1795 - 1796
Dartford High Street
TG0843
1795 - 1796
Dartford High Street
TG0844