For full functionality of this site it is necessary to enable JavaScript. Here are the instructions how to enable JavaScript in your web browser.
Works (?) Thomas Girtin after (?) James Moore

The Refectory, St Martin’s Priory, Dover

(?) 1795

Primary Image: TG0298: (?) Thomas Girtin (1775–1802), after (?) James Moore (1762–99), The Refectory, St Martin's Priory, Dover, (?) 1795, graphite on wove paper (with a fold c.3.2 cm from the bottom), 20 × 17.3 cm, 7 ⅞ × 6 ¾ in. Philadelphia Museum of Art, purchased with funds contributed by Boies Penrose, 1930 (1930-39-13).

Photo courtesy of Philadelphia Museum of Art, Purchased with funds contributed by Boies Penrose, 1930 (Public Domain)

Description
Creator(s)
(?) Thomas Girtin (1775-1802) after (?) James Moore (1762-1799)
Title
  • The Refectory, St Martin’s Priory, Dover
Date
(?) 1795
Medium and Support
Graphite on wove paper (with a fold c.3.2 cm from the bottom)
Dimensions
20 × 17.3 cm, 7 ⅞ × 6 ¹³⁄₁₆ in
Inscription

'Priory Dover' lower right

Object Type
Outline Drawing
Subject Terms
Dover and Kent; Monastic Remains

Collection
Versions
The Refectory, St Martin’s Priory, Dover (TG0341)
Catalogue Number
TG0298
Description Source(s)
Gallery Website

Provenance

Charles Stokes (1785–1853); then by descent to Thomas Hughes; then by descent to his neice, Alice Ellen Hughes; her sale, Sotheby's, 28 November 1922, lot 139 as by Joseph Mallord William Turner; bought by 'Dunthorne', £5; Cotswold Gallery, London; bought from them by the Museum, 1930

Exhibition History

Cotswold Gallery, 1929b, no.85 as 'Dover Priory' by Joseph Mallord William Turner, £25; Cotswold Gallery, 1930b, no.89 as by Joseph Mallord William Turner

Bibliography

Philadelphia Museum of Art Online as 'The Priory, Dover ... attributed to Joseph Mallord William Turner' (Accessed 4/12/2023)

About this Work

This pencil drawing, like a near identical version in the Huntington Art Gallery (TG0341), shows the only surviving part of St Martin’s Priory in Dover: the mid-twelfth-century refectory. Unfortunately, only that much is simple, and the attribution of the two versions is highly problematic since, as with the two watercolours of the interior of the Great Hall at Eltham Palace (TG1383 and TG1384), one is attributed to Joseph Mallord William Turner (1775–1851) by its owner and the other is given to Girtin. The specific problem with this pair is that it is not just the architecture and its details that are repeated in both drawings, but the variable elements such as the carts and the cow are in exactly the same position. Given that it is not possible for the two artists to have sat next to each other and happened upon the same temporary alignment of staffage, one must be a copy of the other. Therefore, in addition to the problem of attribution, it is also essential that we work out which drawing is the copy, and by extension the function that each performed.

A reasonable starting point is to overlay the two images to test whether one was traced from the other. The results are intriguing, because whilst there is a considerable degree of congruence between the two images, particularly to the right of the composition, this is not true of the left side of this sheet, where the buttress has been moved in so that the building appears narrower. Looking at the surviving building in Dover, it is clear that this drawing (TG0298) is more faithful to its appearance, and in normal circumstances this would suggest that it was the sketch made on the spot. However, in this case what appears to have happened is that the author of this sheet, now in the Philadelphia Museum of Art, took the original drawing with its faulty perspective and inaccurate proportions; traced or copied those parts that work; and corrected the image to the left to create the more satisfactory image seen here. Ironically, the artist also introduced a new problem since he miscopied the rear of the two carts in the lean-to, so that it now occupies an illogical space: the process of narrowing the structure left insufficient room for the staffage, therefore.

What we have here, I contend, is the basis for a working hypothesis that does not depend on deciphering the minute, or non-existent, differences in the hands of Girtin and Turner as draughtsmen at this date. I suggest, therefore, that the other drawing (TG0341) is the original and that its shortcomings can be accounted for by the fact that it was actually begun on the spot by Girtin’s first significant patron, the amateur artist and antiquarian James Moore (1762–99). I further contend that, as was commonly the case at this date, Girtin then worked over and elaborated it, strengthening the patron’s weak outlines and perhaps adding the carts and the cow to indicate that the building was used as a barn. This would have been undertaken sometime after Moore’s trip to Kent and Sussex in 1795, as there is no evidence that Girtin ever travelled to Dover. Not having visited the site himself, the artist had no alternative but to accept Moore’s poor perspective, with the result that the image of the building, even after the professional’s improvements, still appears too wide and squat in its proportions. It is a fair assumption, therefore, that Girtin chose to execute this second drawing to correct the faults in Moore’s drawing and that he traced part of the composition whilst reconfiguring the defective area. Turner, it is true, did visit Dover and he even depicted the interior of the refectory of St Martin’s Priory in a finished watercolour from about 1793 (Victoria and Albert Museum, London (P.25–1934)), but it is not possible to envisage a scenario wherein he would have produced two such similar drawings whereas, in comparison, careful replication was a common and integral part of Girtin’s working practice at this date. My increasingly confident conclusion therefore is that both drawings can be at least partly attributed to Girtin, and that placing them in the context of his work for Moore is the key to understanding their function, rather than relying on a stylistic comparison with the drawings of Turner, who I have no reason to think was involved in the production of either.

Image Overlay

(?) 1795

The Refectory, St Martin’s Priory, Dover

TG0341

1796 - 1797

The Interior of the Great Hall of Eltham Palace

TG1383

1794 - 1795

The Interior of the Great Hall of Eltham Palace

TG1384

(?) 1795

The Refectory, St Martin’s Priory, Dover

TG0298

(?) 1795

The Refectory, St Martin’s Priory, Dover

TG0341

by Greg Smith

Place depicted

Revisions & Feedback

The website will be updated from time to time and, when changes are made, a PDF of the previous version of each page will be archived here for consultation and citation.

Please help us to improve this catalogue


If you have information, a correction or any other suggestions to improve this catalogue, please contact us.