For full functionality of this site it is necessary to enable JavaScript. Here are the instructions how to enable JavaScript in your web browser.
Works (?) Thomas Girtin after (?) Edward Dayes

The Interior of Buildwas Abbey Church

1791 - 1792

Primary Image: TG0023: (?) Thomas Girtin (1775–1802), after (?) Edward Dayes (1763–1804), The Interior of Buildwas Abbey Church, 1791–92, graphite, watercolour and pen and ink on wove paper, 26.7 × 39.7 cm, 10 ½ × 15 ⅝ in. Yale Center for British Art, Paul Mellon Collection (B1975.4.1136).

Photo courtesy of Yale Center for British Art, Paul Mellon Collection (Public Domain)

Description
Creator(s)
(?) Thomas Girtin (1775-1802) after (?) Edward Dayes (1763-1804)
Title
  • The Interior of Buildwas Abbey Church
Date
1791 - 1792
Medium and Support
Graphite, watercolour and pen and ink on wove paper
Dimensions
26.7 × 39.7 cm, 10 ½ × 15 ⅝ in
Object Type
Studio Watercolour
Subject Terms
Monastic Ruins; Shropshire View

Collection
Catalogue Number
TG0023
Girtin & Loshak Number
55 as 'Buildwas Abbey' by Thomas Girtin; 'c. 1793'
Description Source(s)
Viewed in 2001; Gallery Website as by Edward Dayes

Provenance

James Moore (1762–99); his widow, Mary Moore (née Howett) (d.1835); bequeathed to Anne Miller (1802–90); bequeathed to Edward Mansel Miller (1829–1912); bequeathed to Helen Louisa Miller (1842–1915); bought by Leggatt Brothers, London, 1915, £35, as by Thomas Girtin; ... Fine Art Society, London, 1965; bought by Paul Mellon (1907–99); presented to the Center, 1975

Exhibition History

New Haven, 1982, III.8, as by Edward Dayes; New Haven, 1986a, no.123 as ’Formerly Attributed to Thomas Girtin’

About this Work

The view from the interior of the nave of the ruined abbey church at Buildwas, looking towards the east end, was catalogued by Thomas Girtin (1874–1960) and David Loshak as by Girtin (Girtin and Loshak, 1954). They argued that it was based on a composition by Edward Dayes (1763–1804) that was known from an untraced watercolour that appeared on the art market in 1952 (Christie’s, 14 March 1952, lot 221). However, the attribution of The Interior of Buildwas Abbey Church was changed to Dayes after the work entered the collection of the Yale Center for British Art, New Haven, and Susan Morris accepted this with the proviso that the figures could ‘possibly’ be ‘by Girtin and the background by Dayes’ (Morris, 1986, p.51). The publication of an on-the-spot colour sketch of the interior of the abbey church (figure 1), which Dayes inscribed on the back, has confirmed that the watercolour was based on a composition by Girtin’s master, though to my mind it has not conclusively established him as the author of this finished studio work (Consagra, 1999, pp.9–10).

The Interior of Buildwas Abbey Church

Figure 1.
Edward Dayes (1763–1804), The Interior of Buildwas Abbey Church, graphite and watercolour on paper, 22.2 × 48.3 cm, 8 ¾ × 19 in. Frances Lehman Loeb Art Center, Gift of Matthew Vassar (1864.1.235).


Digital image courtesy of Frances Lehman Loeb Art Center (All Rights Reserved).

The key to the attribution may lie, as Morris suggests, with the figure and the farm animals in the foreground, which, characteristically for Girtin, are rapidly dashed in with bold lines defining the forms against the ground colour. Given that it is inconceivable that an established artist would allow his apprentice to add figures to a finished composition – and Dayes was more than competent in that area himself – it is more probable that Girtin was able by the end of his apprenticeship to replicate his master’s touch in the sky, the foliage, and the treatment of light and shadow on stone, and add his own characteristic approach to figure drawing. Other copies by Girtin of compositions by Dayes were consigned to early auctions by his master, and those watercolours that it has been possible to identify were often carefully signed and sometimes also dated by the young artist. Rochester Castle, from the River Medway (TG0057) is signed on its original mount and it may be that The Interior of Buildwas Abbey Church was likewise inscribed on a decorative support that was later discarded. That would explain why earlier commentators were so confident about the attribution to Girtin despite the fact that it displays the closest of stylistic debts to Dayes in every area except for the figures. Girtin’s other view of Buildwas (TG0136) is after the sketch of the amateur artist James Moore (1762–99) and is much smaller. In contrast, the larger size, the greater care taken over the finish of the work and the more sophisticated composition are all characteristic features of the versions of Dayes’ watercolours that Dayes himself consigned to auction (such as TG0022), and despite some misgivings this work is perhaps best understood as being produced as a saleable commodity by a student who had matched every aspect of his master’s style

 

(?) 1791

Rochester Castle, from the River Medway

TG0057

1792 - 1793

Buildwas Abbey

TG0136

by Greg Smith

Place depicted

Revisions & Feedback

The website will be updated from time to time and, when changes are made, a PDF of the previous version of each page will be archived here for consultation and citation.

Please help us to improve this catalogue


If you have information, a correction or any other suggestions to improve this catalogue, please contact us.