For full functionality of this site it is necessary to enable JavaScript. Here are the instructions how to enable JavaScript in your web browser.
Works Thomas Girtin and Joseph Mallord William Turner after John Robert Cozens

The Cantilena Convent, near Vietri sul Mare

1794 - 1797

Primary Image: TG0725: Thomas Girtin (1775–1802) and Joseph Mallord William Turner (1775–1851), after John Robert Cozens (1752–97), The Cantilena Convent, near Vietri sul Mare, 1794–97, graphite, watercolour and pen and ink on paper, 18.1 × 23.2 cm, 7 ⅛ × 9 ⅛ in. Private Collection.

Photo courtesy of Paul Mellon Centre Photographic Archive, PA-F05206-0163 (CC BY-NC 4.0)

Artist's source: John Robert Cozens (1752–97), A Convent at Vietri, graphite and varnish on laid paper, 16.8 × 24.1 cm, 6 ⅝ × 9 ½ in. Yale Center for British Art, Paul Mellon Collection (B1977.14.4501).

Photo courtesy of Yale Center for British Art, Paul Mellon Collection (Public Domain)

Description
Creator(s)
Thomas Girtin (1775-1802) and Joseph Mallord William Turner (1775-1851) after John Robert Cozens (1752-1797)
Title
  • The Cantilena Convent, near Vietri sul Mare
Date
1794 - 1797
Medium and Support
Graphite, watercolour and pen and ink on paper
Dimensions
18.1 × 23.2 cm, 7 ⅛ × 9 ⅛ in
Object Type
Collaborations; Monro School Copy
Subject Terms
Italian View: Naples and Environs

Collection
Catalogue Number
TG0725
Description Source(s)
Sale Catalogue

Provenance

Squire Gallery, London, 1955; Sotheby's, 19 April 1961, lot 16 as 'The Convent of Vietri' by Joseph Mallord William Turner; 'Maclaren', £80; Mr and Mrs Hugh Balfour; their sale, Sotheby's, 7 July 1965, lot 52 as by Joseph Mallord William Turner; bought by P & D Colnaghi & Co. Ltd, £170; ... Spink & Son Ltd, London, 1979

Exhibition History

Manning Gallery, London, 1960b, no.8; Spink’s, London, 1979, no.13 as by Joseph Mallord William Turner

About this Work

This view of a convent in the hills above the coastal village of Vietri sul Mare was copied from a composition by John Robert Cozens (1752–97) (see the source image above). It was produced at the home of Dr Thomas Monro (1759–1833), where Girtin and his contemporary Joseph Mallord William Turner (1775–1851) were employed across three winters, probably between 1794 and 1797, to make ‘finished drawings’ from the ‘Copies’ of the ‘outlines or unfinished drawings of Cozens’. The majority of the resulting watercolours saw the two artists engaged in a unique collaboration; as they later recalled, Girtin ‘drew in outlines and Turner washed in the effects’. ‘They went at 6 and staid till Ten’ and, as the diarist Joseph Farington (1747–1821) reported, Turner received ‘3s. 6d each night’, though ‘Girtin did not say what He had’ (Farington, Diary, 12 November 1798).1

Monro’s posthumous sale, in 1833, contained only twenty or so sketches by Cozens, so the patron must have borrowed the majority of the ‘outlines or unfinished drawings’ copied by Girtin and Turner. In this case, the source of the watercolour, a simple outline inscribed ‘Convent of – at Vietri – Septr-26’, was almost certainly purchased at Cozens’ studio sale in July 1794 by Sir George Beaumont (1753–1827).2 As Kim Sloan has noted, Beaumont mounted ‘215 “tracings” or drawings on oiled paper’ in an album that he presumably lent to Monro, and it was from this collection, now at the Yale Center for British Art, New Haven, that the two young artists produced more than fifty watercolours (Sloan and Joyner, 1993, pp.89–91). The source drawing was traced by Cozens himself from an on-the-spot sketch he made on a second visit to Italy, in 1782 (Bell and Girtin, 1935, no.273), when he travelled with his patron William Beckford (1760–1844) and stayed in the Naples area for four months. The sketch is contained in the third of seven sketchbooks that survive from the trip (The Whitworth, Manchester (D.1975.6.14)), and it was presumably traced by Cozens because the books were retained by Beckford. Cozens travelled to Salerno in the middle of September, when, following Beckford’s departure, he was finally free to explore the scenery along the coast, making twenty sketches, which ultimately formed the sources of nine or so Monro School subjects. Following extensive searches, it has finally been possible to identify the large and distinctive building depicted here, and presumably Cozens had much the same problem, leaving the name of the convent blank when he inscribed his sketch. The Cantilena Convent appears again in TG0724. It is not surprising that the identity of the eighteenth-century convent proved difficult to establish since, following its closure in 1809, the building was converted to accomodate various industrial uses, most notably as a glassworks, and the original structure shown here was obscured by later extensions (Aprile and Lupo, 2015, pp737–39).3 The convent was the subject of a number of contemporary views including one by Cozens' contemporary John Warwick Smith (1749–1831).

The bulk of the works sold at Monro’s posthumous sale in 1833 were attributed to Turner alone, but, despite the pioneering article published by Andrew Wilton in 1984, which established the joint authorship of many of the Monro School copies, this work was still listed as solely by Turner when it last appeared on the art market in 1979 (Wilton, 1984a, pp.8–23). This is not entirely surprising given that the watercolour has been quite heavily worked by Turner with a full palette of colours, and this, as far as can be seen from an online image, has effaced much, if not all, of Girtin’s characteristic pencil work. The question then is, if nothing of Girtin’s outline remains visible, does it follow that this view departs from the general practice of the artists at Monro’s house? Although the point can clearly never be proved, I suspect that Girtin was involved in the production of this work, albeit at the most basic level, tracing the outlines from Cozens’ sketch; it was Turner’s more onerous task to obscure the essentially mechanical task of replication and produce something that approximates to a finished work.

1794 - 1797

An Unidentified Convent, near Vietri sul Mare

TG0724

by Greg Smith

Place depicted

Footnotes

  1. 1 The full diary entry, giving crucial details of the artists’ work at Monro’s house, is transcribed in the Documents section of the Archive (1798 – Item 2).
  2. 2 A full record of the sale is available in the Documents section of the Archive (1794 – Item 1)
  3. 3 Thanks to Tim Wilcox for providing me with the reference that finally establishes the identity of the convent near Vietri.

Revisions & Feedback

The website will be updated from time to time and, when changes are made, a PDF of the previous version of each page will be archived here for consultation and citation.

Please help us to improve this catalogue


If you have information, a correction or any other suggestions to improve this catalogue, please contact us.