For full functionality of this site it is necessary to enable JavaScript. Here are the instructions how to enable JavaScript in your web browser.
Works Thomas Girtin and Joseph Mallord William Turner after John Robert Cozens

Naples: Castel Sant'Elmo

1794 - 1797

Primary Image: TG0736: Thomas Girtin (1775–1802) and Joseph Mallord William Turner (1775–1851), after John Robert Cozens (1752–97), Naples: Castel Sant'Elmo, 1794–97, graphite and watercolour on wove paper, on an early mount, 17 × 22.5 cm, 6 ¹¹⁄₁₆ × 8 ⅞ in. Tate, Turner Bequest CCCLXXIV, 13 (D36491).

Photo courtesy of Tate (All Rights Reserved)

Thomas Girtin (1775-1802) and Joseph Mallord William Turner (1775-1851) after John Robert Cozens (1752-1797)
  • Naples: Castel Sant'Elmo
1794 - 1797
Medium and Support
Graphite and watercolour on wove paper, on an early mount
17 × 22.5 cm, 6 ¹¹⁄₁₆ × 8 ⅞ in
Mount Dimensions
36.8 × 48 cm, 14 ½ × 18 ⅞ in
Part of
Object Type
Collaborations; Monro School Copy
Subject Terms
Italian View: Naples and Environs

Catalogue Number
Description Source(s)
Viewed in November 2017


Dr Thomas Monro (1759–1833); his posthumous sale, Christie's, 28 June 1833, lot 79 as ‘Twenty-six sketches in Switzerland and Italy, by Turner, in blue and Indian ink, in a scrap-book’; bought by Thomas Griffith for Joseph Mallord William Turner (1775–1851), £10 10s; accepted by the nation as part of the Turner Bequest, 1856


Finberg, 1909, vol.2, p.1232 as 'Part of ruins of an amphitheatre' by Thomas Girtin; Bell and Girtin, 1935, p.65; Turner Online as 'Naples: The Castel Sant'Elmo' by Joseph Mallord William Turner and Thomas Girtin (Accessed 09/09/2022)

About this Work

This view of the monumental western exterior walls of Castel Sant’Elmo, overlooking the city of Naples, is mounted in an album of watercolours that was bought by Joseph Mallord William Turner (1775–1851) at the posthumous sale of Dr Thomas Monro (1759–1833) (Exhibitions: Christie’s, 28 June 1833, lot 79). The twenty-six drawings were the outcome of a unique collaboration between Girtin and Turner working together at Monro’s London home at the Adelphi. Here the artists were employed across three winters, probably between 1794 and 1797, to make ‘finished drawings’ from the ‘Copies’ of the ‘outlines or unfinished drawings of Cozens’ and other artists, amateur and professional, either from Monro’s collection or lent for the purpose. As the two young artists later recalled, Girtin generally ‘drew in outlines and Turner washed in the effects’. ‘They went at 6 and staid till Ten’, which may account for the generally monochrome appearance of the works, and, as the diarist Joseph Farington (1747–1821) reported, Turner received ‘3s. 6d each night’, though ‘Girtin did not say what He had’ (Farington, Diary, 12 November 1798).1

The view is based on an on-the-spot sketch by John Robert Cozens (1752–97), inscribed ‘Castle of St. Elmo – Naples’, and is dated ‘Novr.10’ (see figure 1) (Bell and Girtin, 1935, no.310). The drawing is found in the fourth of the seven sketchbooks from Cozens’ second Italian trip, which saw the artist travel to Naples in 1782 in the company of his patron William Beckford (1760–1844). It is unlikely that the Monro School watercolour was copied directly from the sketch by Cozens, however. An album put together by Sir George Beaumont (1753–1827), now in the collection of the Yale Center for British Art, New Haven, includes more than seventy tracings from on-the-spot drawings in the first three of the sketchbooks, which provided the basis for more than thirty Monro School works. There are only five tracings from the next three books, but there is no reason to think that others did not exist, and it was presumably from these lost copies by Cozens that as many as thirty-five more watercolours were produced by Girtin and Turner, including this view of the massive walls of the castle. We can be reasonably sure that this was the case here for two reasons. Firstly, the drawing is reversed from both the on-the-spot sketch and the finished studio watercolour that Cozens also produced (see figure 2), suggesting that Girtin’s copy was made from a tracing on a piece of thin paper that he simply turned over so that the design was inverted. Secondly, the Monro School watercolour includes a significant copying error, with the shaded area to the left in the on-the-spot sketch rendered as a prominent rocky outcrop in the copy. What was clearly an area of dark shadow in the on-the spot sketch must have looked quite different in a simple outline tracing. Whilst Cozens, having seen and sketched the building, would have known that the wall was perpendicular throughout its height, Girtin and Turner misinterpreted the limited information at their disposal.

The album containing this drawing was sold in 1833 as the work of Turner, but the cataloguer of the Turner Bequest, Alexander Finberg, thought that Girtin alone was responsible for the watercolours, whilst more recently Andrew Wilton has established their joint authorship (Finberg, 1909, vol.2, p.1232; Wilton, 1984a, pp.8–23). Identifying the division of labour within Monro School drawings is considerably helped, as here, when the colour washes by Turner leave large areas untouched in order to create highlights, so that Girtin’s pencil work is clearly evident, particularly in the figures. In practice, Girtin did little more than trace the general outlines of the composition and it was left to Turner to obscure the essentially mechanical task of replication, though in this case there is an air of incompleteness about the work. The outline is elaborated with just the two tones of the one colour, which means that it lacks much of the drama and power evoked by the Cozens watercolour (see figure 2). Comparing the two drawings refutes any suggestion that the Monro School drawings were copied from Cozens’ watercolours, something that is still occasionally claimed, and, equally, it reminds us that the ‘finished drawings’ that Monro commissioned were finished only in comparison with the slight materials that he was able to borrow.

by Greg Smith

Place depicted


  1. 1 The full diary entry, giving crucial details of the artists’ work at Monro’s house, is transcribed in the Documents section of the Archive (1798 – Item 2).

Revisions & Feedback

The website will be updated from time to time and, when changes are made, a PDF of the previous version of each page will be archived here for consultation and citation.

Please help us to improve this catalogue

If you have information, a correction or any other suggestions to improve this catalogue, please contact us.