For full functionality of this site it is necessary to enable JavaScript. Here are the instructions how to enable JavaScript in your web browser.
Works (?) Thomas Girtin

An Ornamental Ruin in a Park; A Tree on a Mound

1796 - 1797

Primary Image: TG1587: (?) Thomas Girtin (1775–1802), An Ornamental Ruin in a Park, 1796–97, graphite and watercolour on laid paper, 23.5 × 33.2 cm, 9 ¼ × 13 in. British Museum, London (1948,0410.11).

Photo courtesy of The Trustees of the British Museum (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

Primary Image Verso: TG1587 Verso: Thomas Girtin (1775–1802), A Tree on a Mound, 1796–97, graphite and watercolour on laid paper, 23.5 × 33.2 cm, 9 ¼ × 13 in. British Museum, London (1948,0410.11).

Photo courtesy of The Trustees of the British Museum

Description
Creator(s)
(?) Thomas Girtin (1775-1802)
Title
  • An Ornamental Ruin in a Park; A Tree on a Mound
Date
1796 - 1797
Medium and Support
Graphite and watercolour on laid paper
Dimensions
23.5 × 33.2 cm, 9 ¼ × 13 in
Object Type
Studio Watercolour
Subject Terms
The Landscape Park; Unidentified Topographical View

Collection
Catalogue Number
TG1587
Girtin & Loshak Number
233 as 'Ornamental Ruin in a Park' by Thomas Girtin; '1797-8'
Description Source(s)
Viewed in 2001 and 2018

Provenance

Alexander T. Hollingsworth (c.1848–1929); his posthumous sale, Christie’s, 19 April 1929, lot 49 as 'A Landscape, with ruins'; bought by 'Leggatt', £68 5s; Frederick John Nettlefold (1867–1949) by 1935; presented to the Museum, 1948

Bibliography

Grundy, 1933–38, vol.2, pp.130–31

About this Work

Although Thomas Girtin (1874–1960) and David included this view of an unidentified ornamental ruin in their catalogue and dated it to 1797–98, I have long doubted its attribution to Girtin on the grounds of quality (Girtin and Loshak, 1954, p.165). It is possible that the work’s faded condition has dealt harshly with the large areas of foliage in particular, flattening out the forms to create an undifferentiated mass of too-dominant earth tones, but the work has not suffered to the same degree as many, and this cannot account for its poor perspective. Girtin’s depiction of architectural subjects is one of his greatest strengths, and, though his perspective could on occasion go awry, in general he displayed an understanding of both the structural logic of buildings and their decorative details. This is not remotely evident in the bizarre construction shown here, in no known style and depicting what Girtin and Loshak define as ‘bastard architecture’ (Girtin and Loshak, 1954, p.165). Ironically, the unfinished and presumably abandoned view on the back, showing a tree on a mound with figures, is of a higher quality, but likewise there is nothing in its handling to make a compelling case for Girtin as the author, though the composition does resemble the view of Hawarden Castle (TG1350).

(?) 1798

Hawarden Castle

TG1350

by Greg Smith

Revisions & Feedback

The website will be updated from time to time and, when changes are made, a PDF of the previous version of each page will be archived here for consultation and citation.

Please help us to improve this catalogue


If you have information, a correction or any other suggestions to improve this catalogue, please contact us.