For full functionality of this site it is necessary to enable JavaScript. Here are the instructions how to enable JavaScript in your web browser.
Works Thomas Girtin

A Study of a Woman Reading; A Slight Study of a Seated Woman

1794 - 1795

Primary Image: TG1514: Thomas Girtin (1775–1802), A Study of a Woman Reading, 1794–95, graphite on wove paper, 15.2 × 9.6 cm, 6 × 3 ¾ in. Private Collection.

Photo courtesy of Sotheby's (CC BY-NC 4.0)

Primary Image Verso: Thomas Girtin (1775–1802), A Slight Study of a Seated Woman, graphite on wove paper, 15.2 × 9.6 cm, 6 × 3 ¾ in. Private Collection.

Photo courtesy of Sotheby's

Description
Creator(s)
Thomas Girtin (1775-1802)
Title
  • A Study of a Woman Reading; A Slight Study of a Seated Woman
Date
1794 - 1795
Medium and Support
Graphite on wove paper
Dimensions
15.2 × 9.6 cm, 6 × 3 ¾ in
Object Type
Outline Drawing
Subject Terms
Figure Study

Collection
Catalogue Number
TG1514
Description Source(s)
Viewed in October 2024

Provenance

John Postle Heseltine (1843–1929); his posthumous sale, Sotheby’s, 29 May 1935, lot 313; volume bought by Bernard Squire, £32; bought by Walter C. Hetherington (d.1978); his posthumous sale, Christie’s, 14 February 1978, lot 57, £320

About this Work

This study of a girl reading was not included by Thomas Girtin (1874–1960) and David Loshak in their catalogue of the artist’s works. It came from an album of drawings from the collection of John Postle Heseltine (1843–1929) that was well known to the artist's ancestor, however, and so it was presumably excluded because he did not think it was by Girtin. This is surprising because it appears to depict the same girl seen in another figure study (TG1515), down to the same costume, and it is on a piece of paper of similar dimensions. Likewise, the drawings share the same jagged, jerky outlines, and I suspect that they may even have been executed at the same session, probably around 1794–95, rather than the 1800 suggested by Girtin and Loshak for the companion sketch. If the coloured study of the same girl is by Girtin, I cannot see any reason not to attribute this drawing to the artist as well, and indeed in some ways it is a superior effort, with the form of the arms, for instance, much improved. Nonetheless, the voluminous folds of the dress still mask the figure, and the lack of articulation between the upper and lower parts of the body means that her seated position is unconvincing, all of which suggests the work of a young artist who had not gone through the rigours of academic training. If this was the case, rather than being a study of the artist’s wife, as Girtin and Loshak imply of the companion drawing, could it be that this work also depicts his sister Mary, who was born in 1777? Together with the artist himself, she was still living in the home of their mother at St Martin’s-le-Grand around 1794–95.

The same reservations are arguably even more relevant for the slighter study of the same woman that has come to light on the back of the drawing. Presumably unhappy with his first effort, Girtin abandon the drawing without adding any shading to the face and turned the sheet over to try out a simpler pose in which the arms assume a more natural position.

1794 - 1795

A Study of a Young Girl

TG1515

by Greg Smith

Revisions & Feedback

The website will be updated from time to time and, when changes are made, a PDF of the previous version of each page will be archived here for consultation and citation.

Please help us to improve this catalogue


If you have information, a correction or any other suggestions to improve this catalogue, please contact us.