- Description
-
- Creator(s)
- Thomas Girtin (1775-1802)
- Title
-
- A House and Garden at Winster in Derbyshire
- Date
- 1799 - 1800
- Medium and Support
- Graphite and watercolour on laid paper
- Dimensions
- 26.7 × 35.7 cm, 10 ½ × 14 in
- Inscription
‘Girtin’ lower centre, by Thomas Girtin
- Object Type
- Studio Watercolour
- Subject Terms
- Derbyshire View; The Smaller House and Garden
-
- Collection
- Catalogue Number
- TG1573
- Girtin & Loshak Number
- 311i as 'House at Winster, Derbyshire'; '1799'
- Description Source(s)
- Viewed in 2001 and 2018
Provenance
William Ward (1829–1908); bought from him by the Museum, 1890
Exhibition History
London, 1936, no number; London, 1953a, no.33
Bibliography
Binyon, 1898–1907, no.29 as 'Dr. Monro's House at Fetcham'; Davies, 1924, pl.34; British Museum, Collection as 'Dr Monro's House at Winster, Derbyshire' (Accessed 18/09/2022)
Place depicted
Revisions & Feedback
The website will be updated from time to time and, when changes are made, a PDF of the previous version of each page will be archived here for consultation and citation.
Please help us to improve this catalogue
If you have information, a correction or any other suggestions to improve this catalogue, please contact us.
About this Work
This view of a house and garden was thought to be the home of Girtin’s early patron Dr Thomas Monro (1759–1833) until it was correctly identified by Thomas Girtin (1874–1960) and David Loshak from a photograph of an oil painting inscribed ‘at Winster, Derbe’ (see the source image above) (Girtin and Loshak, 1954, p.176). Girtin is not known to have visited that area of Derbyshire, near Matlock, and it is almost certainly the case that his view was based on the painting, rather than, as Girtin and Loshak suggested, that the latter copied Girtin’s watercolour. That, for me, is the logical explanation for why the oil painting contains more of the landscape to the right, so that Girtin reshaped the composition, cutting it and adding framing trees to create a more compact and focused effect that is demonstrably more successful than its source. The watercolour has faded to a certain degree, causing some flattening in the foliage and leaving the yellow highlights too prominent, but it was arguably never one of Girtin’s finest achievements, and there is more than a whiff of hack work about it. However, there is no question about the attribution to Girtin, unlike the anonymous copy in the Victoria and Albert Museum, London, with its fake signature (TG1574). Here, the authentic signature in the foreground has been cut slightly, suggesting that the work was originally mounted and that Girtin’s name, which must have strayed onto it, was partly lost when the support was removed.
It has not been possible to establish the precise circumstances that saw Girtin receiving a commission to paint a modest country house after the work of an unknown regional artist, but there is nonetheless evidence to link the image with Oddo House, the home of the solicitor William Brittlebank (1765–1848), who lived in Winster. The house was demolished sometime after 1891, and it has not been possible to definitively confirm the identification of the property. However, I suspect that it was not a coincidence that Girtin’s watercolour was acquired by the British Museum in the same year that the contents of Oddo House were sold at auction (by George Marsden, 18–21 June 1890), and further work in Derbyshire Record Office might well establish the provenance of the work for certain as well as confirming its presence in the 1890 sale.
1800 - 1810
A House at Winster
TG1574